In July, I predicted oil prices would fall by 30%.My thesis was based on simple economics. Despite lower prices, oil companies would not cut back on production. That’s because they NEED to produce oil to service their massive debt loads.
Recent data from the Energy Information Agency shows that U.S. oil companies are still producing over 9 million barrels of oil per day. To put this in perspective, oil prices are down roughly 60% over the past 14 months … yet, oil production in the U.S. is down just 5% off its record highs!With oil companies across the globe refusing to cut production, the chance for a continued decline in oil prices was high. And as oil prices declined, I predicted this would lead to a pullback in most oil stocks.
Since my call in July, crude has fallen 27.8%. And the average oil producer (based on the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Producers Index) is down about 17% over the same time frame.Some oil producers may look like bargains after this pullback. However, there is likely much more pain ahead for the industry at least over the next six months.As I mentioned earlier, oil prices have fallen sharply — by roughly 60% — over the past 14 months. Yet, U.S. production remains stubbornly high.
The breakeven price for shale producers is roughly $55 a barrel. That means most oil companies will lose money producing oil at current prices. (West Texas Intermediate crude closed at $36.76 last night.)
However, more than 30% of oil production in the U.S. is hedged at much higher prices. That means most oil producers are able to generate profits despite oil prices trading below the breakeven price of $55 a barrel.
In 2016, it will be a much different story. That’s because only 10% of production is hedged. This creates a huge problem for most U.S. oil producers who will now lose money on every barrel of oil they produce.
The logical solution is to hold off producing until prices rebound.However, U.S. oil companies are sitting on more than $500 billion in debt. And this debt is due over the next 5 years.To put this in perspective, 85% of operating cash flow generated by U.S. oil producers is being used to service their debt. This compares to less than 45% in 2014.
Once these hedges come off in 2016, many U.S. producers will not generate enough cash flow to service their debt. Plus, banks recently announced they are reducing credit lines for oil companies next year.
Of course, oil companies will be just fine if prices push through the $55 a barrel level — and stay above this level long-term. However, this is highly unlikely since U.S. companies are still producing near-record amounts of oil.
My suggestion is to stay clear of oil companies at least over the next six months. If prices remain depressed, you will likely see shale producers fall another 30% from here.
That would be a much better entry point for investors.
Read the signs. Beat the market.
The market intelligence you need to invest one step ahead. Go beyond the headlines. Invest with an insider’s edge.
Books are a big part of Wall Street culture. Luke shares his favorite book of all time… and the simple lesson that helped him find the path to big, long-term investment gains.
Learn why Chinese property manager Evergrande rocked the market this week… why it poses a threat to the global economy… and why U.S. investors should invest in China with caution.
It’s time to put on our rally hats… As we near the end of the year, we’re about to enter the mega green zone for stocks. And Luke’s spotted two ETFs primed for huge gains...
OpenAI's HuggingFace debacle: Is AI a cybersecurity risk? Plus, SuperMicro's (SMCI) margins… Open-source vs. closed-source AI models… 2 no-brainer AI power winners… The sector with the most AI risk… China's market manipulation… And stay cautious on SpaceX (SPCX).
DigiPower X (DGXX) CEO Michel Amar breaks down the company's milestone contract with Cerebras (CBRS)… its AI stack roadmap, from real estate to GPU-as-a-service… key catalysts through 2026… and why DigiPower X is in a league of its own.
IBM's (IBM) worst day in 58 years—is it a buying opportunity? Plus, Fed Chair Warsh's testimony… The odds of a rate hike dropped significantly… Two AI buys… The perfect backdrop for big banks… And Wrap's (WRAP) growing TAM.
Meb Faber, cofounder and chief investment officer of Cambria Investment Management, breaks down his new book on the rise of the 250-year bull market… and how much longer it can last. Plus, why U.S. investors should look abroad.
Savvy CEO Eric Goldreyer breaks down the secret to the company's success—and its next growth phase… how AI is helping unlock customer savings… and his exit plan for this hospitality disruptor.
These tech stocks are buys on the pullback. Plus, is it still a "buy-the-dip" market? … What's driving the outperformance in small caps? … Steer clear of this SPAC… Accenture's (ACN) management should be fired… And the broken housing market.
Iran reportedly suspended indirect talks with the U.S. and is threatening to completely block the Strait of Hormuz. That matters because roughly 20% of the world's oil flows through this narrow chokepoint. Here's what it means for oil prices, energy…
The U.S. is tightening sanctions on Iran's oil network. But Iranian barrels are still moving through China and a shadow fleet of tankers, shell companies, and middlemen. Here's why that fragile workaround system matters for crude prices—and energy stocks.
The latest economic data has revived fears of stagflation—a painful mix of weak growth and stubborn inflation. But today's economy isn't the 1970s. Here's what the numbers actually say… and what investors should watch next.
AI is this century's gold rush—and the biggest fortunes will once again go to the companies selling the "shovels." These seven sectors are providing the energy and infrastructure to power the AI boom.
Oil’s sustained price is a major indicator that few are watching. If crude stays elevated, it could keep inflation sticky, limit the Fed’s flexibility, squeeze corporate margins, and shift market leadership. Here’s how to position your portfolio.
War-risk insurance premiums on Strait of Hormuz transits have surged from pre-war levels, and shipping traffic has collapsed by roughly 95%. Here's how insurers are controlling oil transit… and what it means for your portfolio.
The Trump administration plans to drop $2 billion on nine quantum computing companies in exchange for equity stakes. IBM (IBM) gets the biggest slice, but the pure-play names are seeing the real upside. Here's what this signal means for investors.
In July, I predicted oil prices would fall by 30%.My thesis was based on simple economics. Despite lower prices, oil companies would not cut back on production. That’s because they NEED to produce oil to service their massive debt loads.
Recent data from the Energy Information Agency shows that U.S. oil companies are still producing over 9 million barrels of oil per day. To put this in perspective, oil prices are down roughly 60% over the past 14 months … yet, oil production in the U.S. is down just 5% off its record highs!With oil companies across the globe refusing to cut production, the chance for a continued decline in oil prices was high. And as oil prices declined, I predicted this would lead to a pullback in most oil stocks.
Since my call in July, crude has fallen 27.8%. And the average oil producer (based on the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Producers Index) is down about 17% over the same time frame.
Some oil producers may look like bargains after this pullback. However, there is likely much more pain ahead for the industry at least over the next six months.As I mentioned earlier, oil prices have fallen sharply — by roughly 60% — over the past 14 months. Yet, U.S. production remains stubbornly high.
The breakeven price for shale producers is roughly $55 a barrel. That means most oil companies will lose money producing oil at current prices. (West Texas Intermediate crude closed at $36.76 last night.)
However, more than 30% of oil production in the U.S. is hedged at much higher prices. That means most oil producers are able to generate profits despite oil prices trading below the breakeven price of $55 a barrel.
In 2016, it will be a much different story. That’s because only 10% of production is hedged. This creates a huge problem for most U.S. oil producers who will now lose money on every barrel of oil they produce.
The logical solution is to hold off producing until prices rebound.However, U.S. oil companies are sitting on more than $500 billion in debt. And this debt is due over the next 5 years.To put this in perspective, 85% of operating cash flow generated by U.S. oil producers is being used to service their debt. This compares to less than 45% in 2014.
Once these hedges come off in 2016, many U.S. producers will not generate enough cash flow to service their debt. Plus, banks recently announced they are reducing credit lines for oil companies next year.
Of course, oil companies will be just fine if prices push through the $55 a barrel level — and stay above this level long-term. However, this is highly unlikely since U.S. companies are still producing near-record amounts of oil.
My suggestion is to stay clear of oil companies at least over the next six months. If prices remain depressed, you will likely see shale producers fall another 30% from here.
That would be a much better entry point for investors. 
