Avatar photo
By Curzio ResearchMay 22, 2026

The real chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz

Before the U.S.-Iran conflict, nearly 15 million barrels of crude oil transited the Strait of Hormuz every single day—roughly 34% of all global crude oil trade.

Then the missiles started flying… and suddenly the critical trade route was more or less cut off, with tanker traffic dropping by 95%.

Most coverage is focused on Iran’s missiles, warships, and military threats.

But the real story is more complicated… and more consequential for your portfolio.

The insurance problem

Before the conflict, insuring a tanker for a Hormuz transit cost roughly 0.25% of vessel value. On a $200–$300 million tanker, that’s about $500,000–$750,000 per voyage. Already not cheap.

Then the war broke out… and maritime insurers immediately started pulling back war-risk coverage, or repricing it so aggressively that many operators simply couldn’t afford to sail.

War-risk premiums surged to 1–1.5% of vessel value, peaking at approximately 2.5% in early March.

On a $100 million tanker, that’s the difference between a $250,000 insurance bill and a $1 million one—for a single trip.

As of late March, premiums had eased back to around 1% but were still running significantly above pre-war levels.

At one point, more than 150 tankers—including crude and LNG vessels—had dropped anchor in Gulf waters rather than attempt a transit.

Simply put, the standstill isn’t only about missiles and warships. It’s also about underwriters deciding the math no longer works.

That’s a huge deal.

The second-order effects

Most financial media coverage is focused on oil and misses the deeper structural disruption.

When tankers can’t get insurance, they can’t move cargo. When cargo can’t move, refineries don’t get feedstock. When refineries don’t get feedstock, fuel prices climb—not just at the pump, but in every supply chain that runs on energy.

That means food, manufacturing, air travel… everything.

The insurance market is the mechanism by which geopolitical risk gets transmitted into the real economy.

And right now, that mechanism is under enormous stress.

What this means for investors

There are a few places worth watching.

First, tanker names like Frontline (FRO), DHT Holdings (DHT), and Teekay Tankers (TNK) that can continue to operate are commanding crisis-level rates. 

Second, any sustained disruption to a third of global crude trade is a structural support for oil prices. That benefits integrated majors like ExxonMobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX).

Third, and most underappreciated, the insurers themselves. Chubb (CB) is the lead partner in a U.S.-backed maritime insurance facility covering war hull risk, war P&I, and war cargo insurance for eligible vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. That’s a company that sees both the risk and the opportunity clearly.

Bottom line

Geopolitical crises tend to get framed as military chess matches. But the lever that actually moves markets is almost always financial infrastructure: credit, insurance, payment rails, etc.

With the Strait of Hormuz situation, war-risk underwriters are helping dictate where oil flows.

That’s the real chokepoint.

For more deep-dive insights into what’s moving the market—and how to position your portfolio—join Wall Street Unplugged Premium today.


References:

Hormuz shipping traffic down ~95% from pre-war average of 178 ships/day — World Economic Forum

Nearly 15 million b/d of crude, ~34% of global crude oil trade, passes through Hormuz — IEA / Speed Commerce

Pre-conflict war-risk premium ~0.25% of vessel value; ~$500,000–$750,000 per transit on a $200–$300M tanker — Economist Intelligence Unit 

War-risk premiums trending 1–1.5% of vessel value during conflict — Reuters / Marsh

Premiums peaked ~2.5% in early March, eased to ~1% by late March — still ~8x pre-war levels — Albany Antree / S&P Global 

For a $100M tanker, war-risk premium jumped from ~$200,000 to ~$1M per voyage — Al Jazeera

Over 150 vessels including oil and LNG tankers anchored in/around Hormuz rather than transit — The Guardian

Brent crude surged 10–13% to ~$80–$82/barrel in first days of crisis — Wikipedia / 2026 Iran war fuel crisis

Teekay Q2 2026 tanker rates at record levels due to Hormuz disruption — Cyprus Shipping News

Chubb announced wartime maritime insurance facility for Hormuz transits covering hull, liability, cargo, and war risk — Reuters

What’s really moving these markets?
Subscribe to access daily market updates and exclusive content
More about Growth Trends

Will SpaceX be the next Tesla?

The SpaceX (SPCX) IPO: Can Musk pull off another Tesla (TSLA)? Plus, Nvidia (NVDA) is still cheap… Walmart's (WMT) CEO is in a tough spot… Key moves from the latest 13Fs… And a trade on Trump's China trip.

Quantum computing

The U.S. just bought a stake in quantum computing

The Trump administration plans to drop $2 billion on nine quantum computing companies in exchange for equity stakes. IBM (IBM) gets the biggest slice, but the pure-play names are seeing the real upside. Here's what this signal means for investors.

A market pullback is coming

Why investors must prepare for a pullback. Plus, a sector to buy—and one to avoid—amid rising inflation… Expectations for Nvidia's (NVDA) earnings… Could voters slow down the AI train? … Berkshire's (BRK.B) 13F moves… And Target's (TGT) turnaround.

More from Curzio Research
Inflation

Inflation could hit 5% before the midterms

The market has spent months celebrating the death of inflation. It was premature. The CPI is accelerating fast… And if the current trend holds, inflation could exceed 5% by November. Here's what that means for your portfolio right now.

Is AI in a bubble?

Everyone's calling AI a bubble. But a closer look at the numbers shows this boom is still in the early innings—and the biggest winners will come from these five sectors.

Tech 2026

Wall Street was wrong on AI spending

The market thought AI spending had peaked. Big Tech earnings just proved otherwise. With CapEx accelerating and demand surging, the opportunity is expanding. Here's what the numbers reveal—and where investors should be looking next.